Instantly calling the `hasOwnProperty` technique on an object through `Object.prototype` is discouraged. As a substitute, it is beneficial to make use of the `hasOwnProperty` technique out there by way of the `Object` itself, like `Object.hasOwn(targetObject, propertyName)`. Alternatively, one can make the most of the `in` operator with a `hasOwnProperty` verify, reminiscent of `if (propertyName in targetObject && targetObject.hasOwnProperty(propertyName))`. For example, to verify if an object `myObject` has a property referred to as `title`, the popular technique is `Object.hasOwn(myObject, ‘title’)` fairly than `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.name(myObject, ‘title’)`. This method avoids potential points that may come up when the prototype chain has been modified, guaranteeing correct property checks.
This apply safeguards towards surprising conduct if the prototype chain is modified or if the goal object has a property named `hasOwnProperty` that shadows the prototype technique. By using `Object.hasOwn()` or the `in` operator with an specific `hasOwnProperty` verify, builders guarantee code readability, robustness, and maintainability. This greatest apply has turn into more and more standardized in trendy JavaScript environments.
